Talk

21-Kemna

Talk.21-Kemna History

Hide minor edits - Show changes to output

Changed line 19 from:
[[<<]] %color=#ff7f00%[[Path:/moos-dawg11/material/21-brief-schmidt.pdf | '''DOWNLOAD''']]%% the brief given at MOOS-DAWG'11.
to:
[[<<]] %color=#ff7f00%[[Path:/moos-dawg11/material/21-brief-kemna.pdf | '''DOWNLOAD''']]%% the brief given at MOOS-DAWG'11.
Added line 19:
[[<<]] %color=#ff7f00%[[Path:/moos-dawg11/material/21-brief-schmidt.pdf | '''DOWNLOAD''']]%% the brief given at MOOS-DAWG'11.
Changed line 27 from:
* Collaborative Autonomy
to:
* Autonomy / Collaborative Autonomy
Changed line 25 from:
* UUVs/AUVs
to:
* Unmanned Underwater Vehicles (UUVs) / Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs)
Changed line 26 from:
* Ocean Explorer UUV
to:
* The Ocean Explorer UUV
Added line 23:
* IvP Helm Behavior Development
Added lines 25-27:
* UUVs/AUVs
* Ocean Explorer UUV
* Collaborative Autonomy
Changed line 17 from:
This talk discusses BHV OpRegionBounce developed in response to the above described scenario. The behaviour is an adaptation of BHV OpRegion with a bounce buffer for perimeter, maximum depth and minimum altitude. It has been tested in simulation for all potential combinations of all three possible safety breaches. Performance has been verified during NURC’s June Engineering Trial, and results will be presented.
to:
This talk discusses BHV OpRegionBounce developed in response to the above described scenario. The behaviour is an adaptation of BHV_OpRegion with a bounce buffer for perimeter, maximum depth and minimum altitude. It has been tested in simulation for all potential combinations of all three possible safety breaches. Performance has been verified during NURC’s June Engineering Trial, and results will be presented.
Changed line 15 from:
Within the Cooperative Anti-Submarine Warfare programme at the NATO Undersea Research Centre, MOOS-IvP is used as the autonomy middleware for NURC’s two Ocean Explorer autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs). During NURC’s March engineering trial, we encountered a situation where one AUV came so near the defined operational region (OpRegion) that fears were raised of the vehicle hitting the perimeter. In such a case the currently used BHV OpRegion would have created a behaviour error and set all DESIRED * values to zero. For surface vehicles, setting the DESIRED\_* values to zero makes sense, but for underwater vehicles, this can be dangerous without adequate surface safety measures.
to:
Within the Cooperative Anti-Submarine Warfare programme at the NATO Undersea Research Centre, MOOS-IvP is used as the autonomy middleware for NURC’s two Ocean Explorer autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs). During NURC’s March engineering trial, we encountered a situation where one AUV came so near the defined operational region (OpRegion) that fears were raised of the vehicle hitting the perimeter. In such a case the currently used BHV OpRegion would have created a behaviour error and set all DESIRED_* values to zero. For surface vehicles, setting the DESIRED_* values to zero makes sense, but for underwater vehicles, this can be dangerous without adequate surface safety measures.
Changed line 15 from:
Within the Cooperative Anti-Submarine Warfare programme at the NATO Undersea Research Centre, MOOS-IvP is used as the autonomy middleware for NURC’s two Ocean Explorer autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs). During NURC’s March engineering trial, we encountered a situation where one AUV came so near the defined operational region (OpRegion) that fears were raised of the vehicle hitting the perimeter. In such a case the currently used BHV OpRegion would have created a behaviour error and set all DESIRED * values to zero. For surface vehicles, setting the DESIRED_* values to zero makes sense, but for underwater vehicles, this can be dangerous without adequate surface safety measures.
to:
Within the Cooperative Anti-Submarine Warfare programme at the NATO Undersea Research Centre, MOOS-IvP is used as the autonomy middleware for NURC’s two Ocean Explorer autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs). During NURC’s March engineering trial, we encountered a situation where one AUV came so near the defined operational region (OpRegion) that fears were raised of the vehicle hitting the perimeter. In such a case the currently used BHV OpRegion would have created a behaviour error and set all DESIRED * values to zero. For surface vehicles, setting the DESIRED\_* values to zero makes sense, but for underwater vehicles, this can be dangerous without adequate surface safety measures.
Changed line 15 from:
Within the Cooperative Anti-Submarine Warfare programme at the NATO Undersea Re- search Centre, MOOS-IvP is used as the autonomy middleware for NURC’s two Ocean Explorer autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs). During NURC’s March engineering trial, we encountered a situation where one AUV came so near the defined operational region (OpRegion) that fears were raised of the vehicle hitting the perimeter. In such a case the currently used BHV OpRegion would have created a behaviour error and set all DESIRED * values to zero. For surface vehicles, setting the DESIRED * values to zero makes sense, but for underwater vehicles, this can be dangerous without adequate surface safety measures.
to:
Within the Cooperative Anti-Submarine Warfare programme at the NATO Undersea Research Centre, MOOS-IvP is used as the autonomy middleware for NURC’s two Ocean Explorer autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs). During NURC’s March engineering trial, we encountered a situation where one AUV came so near the defined operational region (OpRegion) that fears were raised of the vehicle hitting the perimeter. In such a case the currently used BHV OpRegion would have created a behaviour error and set all DESIRED * values to zero. For surface vehicles, setting the DESIRED_* values to zero makes sense, but for underwater vehicles, this can be dangerous without adequate surface safety measures.
Changed lines 5-6 from:
!!!! %color=#7777BB% [[Talk.17-Vermeij | Prev-Talk]]%%  | \
%color=#7777BB%[[Talk.19-Schmidt | Next-Talk]]%% | \
to:
!!!! %color=#7777BB% [[Talk.20-Schmidt | Prev-Talk]]%%  | \
%color=#7777BB%[[Talk.22-Kemna | Next-Talk]]%% | \
Changed lines 11-29 from:
!! Talk-18: ''The EvoLogics Acoustic Modem Integration into NURC’s MOOS Environment''

!!!!%color=#449944% '''Arjan Vermeij, NATO Undersea Research Centre (NURC)'''

The NATO Undersea Research Centre (NURC) recently acquired acoustic modems from EvoLogics. These modems, of type S2C R 8/16, are to be used in an upcoming sea trial on board our two Ocean Explorer (OEX) autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs). They should provide the ability to communicate at longer ranges and possibly with a higher data throughput, than currently achievable with our WHOI (Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute) Micro-Modems.

As part of the Collaborative Anti-Submarine Warfare programme, NURC researches communications and networks in the maritime environment
. This project aims to evolve underwater communications from point-to-point underwater messaging into true net- working, taking into account the limitations imposed by the underwater acoustic channel, such as high latency and bandwidth constraints. This involves the development of an underwater communications stack.

There are some requirements on the integration of the EvoLogics modem into NURC’s MOOS environment:

* The EvoLogics modem has the ability to operate in different modes, which should remain available
.
* The MAC layer, already available in the EvoLogics modem, should be usable.
* The integration should allow for potential replacement and addition of components developed within the communications and networking task.
* If possible, the EvoLogics modem should be able to work in parallel to the WHOI Micro-Modem.

This presentation discusses the design and developed applications as part of this inte- gration process. Furthermore, initial results obtained during the June engineering trial are presented.

A reprint of this presentation, including the source code of the developed processes, will be made available through NURC, after the conference.

to:
!! Talk-21: ''BHV OpRegionBounce: An OpRegion that Can Bounce You Back''

!!!!%color=#449944% '''Stephanie Kemna, NATO Undersea Research Centre (NURC)'''

Within the Cooperative Anti-Submarine Warfare programme at the NATO Undersea Re- search Centre, MOOS-IvP is used as the autonomy middleware for NURC’s two Ocean Explorer autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs). During NURC’s March engineering trial, we encountered a situation where one AUV came so near the defined operational region (OpRegion) that fears were raised of the vehicle hitting the perimeter. In such a case the currently used BHV OpRegion would have created a behaviour error and set all DESIRED * values to zero. For surface vehicles, setting the DESIRED * values to zero makes sense, but for underwater vehicles, this can be dangerous without adequate surface safety measures.

This talk discusses BHV OpRegionBounce developed in response to the above described scenario. The behaviour is an adaptation of BHV OpRegion with a bounce buffer for perimeter, maximum depth and minimum altitude. It has been tested in simulation for all potential combinations of all three possible safety breaches
. Performance has been verified during NURC’s June Engineering Trial, and results will be presented.
Changed line 13 from:
!!!!%color=#449944% '''Arjan Vermeij, NATO Undersea Research Centre'''
to:
!!!!%color=#449944% '''Arjan Vermeij, NATO Undersea Research Centre (NURC)'''
Changed lines 5-6 from:
!!!! %color=#7777BB% [[Talk.01-Lepage|Prev-Talk]]%%  | \
%color=#7777BB%[[Talk.02-YaariA|Next-Talk]]%% | \
to:
!!!! %color=#7777BB% [[Talk.17-Vermeij | Prev-Talk]]%%  | \
%color=#7777BB%[[Talk.19-Schmidt | Next-Talk]]%% | \
Changed lines 21-22 from:
The EvoLogics modem has the ability to operate in different modes, which should remain available.
to:
* The EvoLogics modem has the ability to operate in different modes, which should remain available.
Changed lines 11-16 from:
!! Talk-01: ''Behaviour Development for Anti-Submarine Warfare: The Design of a MOOS-IvP Behavior Based on Maximizing the Doppler of Autonomous Assets Operating Within a Bistatic Sonar System''

!!!!%color=#449944% '''Kevin LePage, NATO Undersea Research Centre'''

The NATO Undersea Research Centre is currently exploring system concepts for collaborative ASW using AUVs.  As part of this effort the design of autonomy algorithms (behaviours) which are adaptive on Doppler-sensitive sonar signals is being pursued.  MOOS-IvP is
currently used onboard two Ocean Explorer AUVs which each have horizontal line arrays and accompanying CW signal processing software capable of converting acoustic signals into time-bearing-Doppler contacts.  These contacts are fused with FM contacts within NURC's DMHT tracker.  The fused CW-FM tracks are acted on by the behaviours implemented within the MOOS-IvP software architecture.  In this talk we explore the performance of a behaviour which seeks to maximize the future Doppler on contacts of interest. The collaborative use of this behaviour with a second vehicle performing traditional FM processing is also considered.
to:
!! Talk-18: ''The EvoLogics Acoustic Modem Integration into NURC’s MOOS Environment''

!!!!%color=#449944% '''Arjan Vermeij, NATO Undersea Research Centre'''

The NATO Undersea Research Centre (NURC) recently acquired acoustic modems from EvoLogics. These modems, of type S2C R 8/16, are to be used in an upcoming sea trial on board our two Ocean Explorer (OEX) autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs). They should provide the ability to communicate at longer ranges and possibly with a higher data throughput, than
currently achievable with our WHOI (Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute) Micro-Modems.

As part of the Collaborative Anti-Submarine Warfare programme, NURC researches communications and networks in the maritime environment
. This project aims to evolve underwater communications from point-to-point underwater messaging into true net- working, taking into account the limitations imposed by the underwater acoustic channel, such as high latency and bandwidth constraints. This involves the development of an underwater communications stack.

There are some requirements on the integration
of the EvoLogics modem into NURC’s MOOS environment:

• The EvoLogics modem has the ability to operate in different modes, which should remain available
.

* The MAC layer, already available in the EvoLogics modem, should be usable.
* The integration should allow for potential replacement and addition of components developed within the communications and networking task.
* If possible, the EvoLogics modem should be able to work in parallel to the WHOI Micro-Modem.

This presentation discusses the design and developed applications as part of this inte- gration process. Furthermore, initial results obtained during the June engineering trial are presented.

A reprint of this presentation, including the source code of the developed processes, will be made available through NURC, after the conference.
Changed line 5 from:
!!!! %color=#7777BB% [[Talk.01-Newman|Prev-Talk]]%%  | \
to:
!!!! %color=#7777BB% [[Talk.01-Lepage|Prev-Talk]]%%  | \
Changed lines 11-21 from:
!! Talk-01: ''MOOS Then, Now and Next''

!!!!%color=#449944% '''Paul Newman, Oxford'''

I will provide a perspective about where MOOS came from, why I designed it as I did, where I think its
strengths lie and where I think there
is room for improvement. I will describe of the range of
platforms and projects MOOS has been, is and will be used on. I won't restrict attention to the marine domain - indeed some of the most challenging deployments have been on land in particular large scale infrastructure free navigation. As I conclude I'll look ahead to the planned next substantial release of MOOS  and describe the new functionality therein
.



to:
!! Talk-01: ''Behaviour Development for Anti-Submarine Warfare: The Design of a MOOS-IvP Behavior Based on Maximizing the Doppler of Autonomous Assets Operating Within a Bistatic Sonar System''

!!!!%color=#449944% '''Kevin LePage, NATO Undersea Research Centre'''

The NATO Undersea Research Centre
is currently exploring system concepts for collaborative ASW using AUVs.  As part of this effort the design of autonomy algorithms (behaviours) which are adaptive on Doppler-sensitive sonar signals is being pursued.  MOOS-IvP is currently used onboard two Ocean Explorer AUVs which each have horizontal line arrays and accompanying CW signal processing software capable of converting acoustic signals into time-bearing-Doppler contacts.  These contacts are fused with FM contacts within NURC's DMHT tracker.  The fused CW-FM tracks are acted on by the behaviours implemented within the MOOS-IvP software architecture.  In this talk we explore the performance of a behaviour which seeks to maximize the future Doppler on contacts of interest. The collaborative use of this behaviour with a second vehicle performing traditional FM processing is also considered.



Changed lines 22-24 from:
* MOOS Core
* Academia

%%
to:
* MOOS-IvP
* Anti-Submarine Warfare

%%
Changed lines 11-12 from:
!! Talk-01: ''MOOS Updates (PLACEHOLDER)''
to:
!! Talk-01: ''MOOS Then, Now and Next''
Changed lines 15-18 from:
No Abstract Yet.


to:
I will provide a perspective about where MOOS came from, why I designed it as I did, where I think its
strengths lie and where I think there is room for improvement
. I will describe of the range of
platforms and projects MOOS has been, is and will be used on. I won't restrict attention to the marine domain - indeed some of the most challenging deployments have been on land in particular large scale infrastructure free navigation. As I conclude I'll look ahead to the planned next substantial release of MOOS  and describe the new functionality therein.




Added line 24:
* MOOS Core
Changed line 8 from:
%color=#7777BB%[[Talk.ListingSorted|All-Sorted]]%% 
to:
%color=#7777BB%[[Talk.ListingSorted|Talks-Sorted]]%% 
Changed line 7 from:
%color=#7777BB%[[Talk.Listing|All-Talks]] |
to:
%color=#7777BB%[[Talk.Listing|All-Talks]] | \
Changed lines 7-8 from:
%color=#7777BB%[[Talk.Listing|All-Talks]]%% 
to:
%color=#7777BB%[[Talk.Listing|All-Talks]] |
%color=#7777BB%[[Talk.ListingSorted|All-Sorted
]]%% 
Changed lines 5-6 from:
!!!! %color=#7777BB% [[Talk.03-Redfield|Prev-Talk]]%%  | \
%color=#7777BB%[[Talk.05-BillinGumstix|Next-Talk]]%% | \
to:
!!!! %color=#7777BB% [[Talk.01-Newman|Prev-Talk]]%%  | \
%color=#7777BB%[[Talk.02-YaariA|Next-Talk]]%% | \
Changed lines 10-17 from:
!! Talk-29: ''Integration and Testing of a Novel Reacquire/Identify Pattern Generation Algorithm''

!!!!%color=#449944% '''Matthew J. Bays, Jean-François Kamath and Signe A. Redfield, NSWC-PCD'''

We address the integration and field testing of a novel reacquire/identify(RID) pattern generation algorithm.  This algorithm, known as Probabilistic Reacquire/ID Optimal Path Selection (PROPS), is designed to plan a path for a sidescan sonar equipped underwater vehicle in order to produce multiple views of a cluster of discrete targets.  The desired pattern minimizes the total number of turns and time required, while attaining appropriate coverage of the targets. Initial tests of the pattern generation algorithm suggest that it requires between 35% and 95% of the time required by the standard “star” RID pattern.  Following a brief description of the algorithm itself, we present the integration of the algorithm, both as a stand-alone MOOS module and as a library using a standard RID pattern generator created from the MOOS-IvP Helm autonomy toolkit.  Simulation and field test results of the algorithm on a REMUS 100 autonomous underwater vehicle are included
.


to:
!! Talk-01: ''MOOS Updates (PLACEHOLDER)''

!!!!%color=#449944% '''Paul Newman, Oxford'''

No Abstract Yet
.


Changed lines 20-24 from:
* Autonomy
* MOOS-IvP
* MCM
* UUVs
* Navy Labs
to:
* Academia
Changed line 18 from:
!!!!%color=#BD614A% '''Categories:''' \
to:
!!!!%color=#4444BB% '''Categories:''' \
Changed line 10 from:
!! Talk-04: ''Integration and Testing of a Novel Reacquire/Identify Pattern Generation Algorithm''
to:
!! Talk-29: ''Integration and Testing of a Novel Reacquire/Identify Pattern Generation Algorithm''
Changed line 18 from:
!!!%color=#BD614A% '''Categories:''' \
to:
!!!!%color=#BD614A% '''Categories:''' \
Changed line 18 from:
%color=#BD614A% '''Categories:''' \
to:
!!!%color=#BD614A% '''Categories:''' \
Changed lines 6-7 from:
%color=#7777BB%[[Talk.05-BillinGumstix|Next-Talk]]%% 
to:
%color=#7777BB%[[Talk.05-BillinGumstix|Next-Talk]]%% | \
%color=#7777BB%[[Talk.Listing|All-Talks
]]%% 
Changed line 11 from:
!!!!%color=#449944% '''Matthew J. Bays, Jean- François Kamath and Signe A. Redfield, NSWC-PCD'''
to:
!!!!%color=#449944% '''Matthew J. Bays, Jean-François Kamath and Signe A. Redfield, NSWC-PCD'''
Changed line 5 from:
!!!! %color=#7777BB% [[Talk.03-Redfield|Prev-Talk]]%%  |
to:
!!!! %color=#7777BB% [[Talk.03-Redfield|Prev-Talk]]%%  | \
Changed lines 5-6 from:
!!!! %color=#7777BB% [[Talk.03-Redfield|Prev-Talk]]%%  | [[Talk.05-BillinGumstix|Next-Talk]] 
to:
!!!! %color=#7777BB% [[Talk.03-Redfield|Prev-Talk]]%%  |
%color=#7777BB%[[Talk.05-BillinGumstix|Next-Talk]]%% 
Changed line 5 from:
!!!! %color=#444499% [[Talk.03-Redfield|Prev-Talk]]%%  | [[Talk.05-BillinGumstix|Next-Talk]] 
to:
!!!! %color=#7777BB% [[Talk.03-Redfield|Prev-Talk]]%%  | [[Talk.05-BillinGumstix|Next-Talk]] 
Changed line 5 from:
!!!! %color=#449944% [[Talk.03-Redfield|Prev-Talk]]%%  | [[Talk.05-BillinGumstix|Next-Talk]] 
to:
!!!! %color=#444499% [[Talk.03-Redfield|Prev-Talk]]%%  | [[Talk.05-BillinGumstix|Next-Talk]] 
Changed line 5 from:
[[Talk.03-Redfield|Prev-Talk]]  | [[Talk.05-BillinGumstix|Next-Talk]] 
to:
!!!! %color=#449944% [[Talk.03-Redfield|Prev-Talk]]%%  | [[Talk.05-BillinGumstix|Next-Talk]] 
Changed line 5 from:
[[Talk.04-Redfield|Prev-Talk]]  | [[Talk.04-Redfield|Next-Talk]] 
to:
[[Talk.03-Redfield|Prev-Talk]]  | [[Talk.05-BillinGumstix|Next-Talk]] 
Added lines 4-6:

[[Talk.04-Redfield|Prev-Talk]]  | [[Talk.04-Redfield|Next-Talk]] 

Changed line 7 from:
%color=#449944% '''Matthew J. Bays, Jean- François Kamath and Signe A. Redfield, NSWC-PCD'''
to:
!!!!%color=#449944% '''Matthew J. Bays, Jean- François Kamath and Signe A. Redfield, NSWC-PCD'''
Changed line 5 from:
!! ''Integration and Testing of a Novel Reacquire/Identify Pattern Generation Algorithm''
to:
!! Talk-04: ''Integration and Testing of a Novel Reacquire/Identify Pattern Generation Algorithm''
Changed line 13 from:
%color=#BD614A% '''Topics:''' \
to:
%color=#BD614A% '''Categories:''' \
Added line 19:
* Navy Labs
Changed lines 5-11 from:
!! ''MOOS-Enabled Semi-Autonomous Remote USV Operations''

%color=#449944% '''Signe Redfield, NSWC-PCD'''

A multi-vehicle mission involving simultaneous identification (by UUVs) and neutralization (by a USV)
of targets is complicated by the need to keep the neutralization efforts distant from the
identification vehicles.  As targets are identified by the UUVs, they are relayed to the USV for imaging (proxy for neutralization).  The USV plans
a sequence of neutralization efforts based on desired efficiency (prosecuting targets in close proximity in the same sequence), neutralization capacity (number of targets that can be prosecuted without reloading), the location of the reloading depot, and distance from other vehicles.  We present a solution to this variation of the capacitated vehicle routing problem, implemented on a semi-autonomous USV.  MOOS performed the autonomous portion of the mission running on a remote laptop while a human operator ran a teleoperated underwater vehicle launched and retrieved from the USV as a proxy for the neutralization system as each target was reached. Together the system demonstrated semi-autonomous remote USV operations, with the human operator working smoothly with the autonomous system.
to:
!! ''Integration and Testing of a Novel Reacquire/Identify Pattern Generation Algorithm''

%color=#449944% '''Matthew J. Bays, Jean- François Kamath and Signe A. Redfield, NSWC-PCD'''

We address the integration and field testing
of a novel reacquire/identify(RID) pattern generation algorithm.  This algorithm, known as Probabilistic Reacquire/ID Optimal Path Selection (PROPS), is designed to plan a path for a sidescan sonar equipped underwater vehicle in order to produce multiple views of a cluster of discrete targets.  The desired pattern minimizes the total number of turns and time required, while attaining appropriate coverage of the targets. Initial tests of the pattern generation algorithm suggest that it requires between 35% and 95% of the time required by the standard “star” RID pattern.  Following a brief description of the algorithm itself, we present the integration of the algorithm, both as a stand-alone MOOS module and as a library using a standard RID pattern generator created from the MOOS-IvP Helm autonomy toolkit.  Simulation and field test results of the algorithm on a REMUS 100 autonomous underwater vehicle are included.


Deleted line 14:
* Multi-Vehicle Autonomy
Changed line 17 from:
* Neutralization
to:
* MCM
Deleted line 18:
* USVs
Changed lines 5-10 from:
!! ''Autonomous Adaptive Environmental Feature Tracking on Board AUVs: Tracking the Thermocline''

%color=#449944% '''Stephanie Petillo, MIT (LAMSS)'''

This talk addresses the challenge of autonomously and adaptively tracking features of the underwater environment using AUVs running the MOOS-IvP autonomy software.  This problem is addressed from concept to implementation in the field on various AUV platforms, developing specifically the example of thermocline trackingSome recent research involving methods for feature tracking on board multiple AUVs operating simultaneously and collaboratively to detect an underwater feature will also be discussed briefly.
to:
!! ''MOOS-Enabled Semi-Autonomous Remote USV Operations''

%color=#449944% '''Signe Redfield, NSWC-PCD'''

A multi-vehicle mission involving simultaneous identification (by UUVs) and neutralization (by a USV) of targets is complicated by the need to keep the neutralization efforts distant from the
identification vehicles.  As targets are identified by
the UUVs, they are relayed to the USV for imaging (proxy for neutralization)The USV plans a sequence of neutralization efforts based on desired efficiency (prosecuting targets in close proximity in the same sequence), neutralization capacity (number of targets that can be prosecuted without reloading), the location of the reloading depot, and distance from other vehicles.  We present a solution to this variation of the capacitated vehicle routing problem, implemented on a semi-autonomous USV.  MOOS performed the autonomous portion of the mission running on a remote laptop while a human operator ran a teleoperated underwater vehicle launched and retrieved from the USV as a proxy for the neutralization system as each target was reached. Together the system demonstrated semi-autonomous remote USV operations, with the human operator working smoothly with the autonomous system.
Deleted line 13:
* Environmental Sampling
Added line 17:
* Neutralization
Added line 19:
* USVs
Added line 17:
* UUVs
Changed lines 9-10 from:
One of the greatest challenges of working in the underwater regime is the severe limitations of acoustic communications. This problem becomes even more evident in multi-vehicle autonomy, when vehicles must continually update each other with their state and intentions to achieve cooperative goals. In order to support tests of a multi-vehicle arbiter framework, an optimization scheme was created and implemented as a MOOS module to enable sufficient message passing between vehicles. Using this tool, vehicle state and destination, shared map updates, updated algorithm parameters, target information, and decision reconciliation can be effectively shared between vehicles using the published Compact Control Language (CCL) standard for acoustic messages.
to:
This talk addresses the challenge of autonomously and adaptively tracking features of the underwater environment using AUVs running the MOOS-IvP autonomy software.  This problem is addressed from concept to implementation in the field on various AUV platforms, developing specifically the example of thermocline tracking.  Some recent research involving methods for feature tracking on board multiple AUVs operating simultaneously and collaboratively to detect an underwater feature will also be discussed briefly.
Changed line 13 from:
* Acoustic Communications,
to:
* Environmental Sampling
Changed lines 15-17 from:
* Autonomy%%
to:
* Autonomy
* MOOS-IvP
%%
Changed line 7 from:
%color=#449944% '''Stephanie Petillo, MIT (LAMSS)''
to:
%color=#449944% '''Stephanie Petillo, MIT (LAMSS)'''
Changed lines 5-7 from:
!! ''Unmanned Robot Message Optimization Method (URMOM)''

%color=#449944% '''Andrew Bouchard, NSWC-PCD'''
to:
!! ''Autonomous Adaptive Environmental Feature Tracking on Board AUVs: Tracking the Thermocline''

%color=#449944% '''Stephanie Petillo, MIT (LAMSS)''
Changed lines 11-15 from:
%color=#BD614A% '''Topics:''' Acoustic Communications, Multi-Vehicle Autonomy, Autonomy%%
to:
%color=#BD614A% '''Topics:''' \

*
Acoustic Communications,
*
Multi-Vehicle Autonomy
* Autonomy%%
Changed line 11 from:
''Topics:'' Acoustic Communications, Multi-Vehicle Autonomy, Autonomy
to:
%color=#BD614A% '''Topics:''' Acoustic Communications, Multi-Vehicle Autonomy, Autonomy%%
Changed lines 9-11 from:
One of the greatest challenges of working in the underwater regime is the severe limitations of acoustic communications. This problem becomes even more evident in multi-vehicle autonomy, when vehicles must continually update each other with their state and intentions to achieve cooperative goals. In order to support tests of a multi-vehicle arbiter framework, an optimization scheme was created and implemented as a MOOS module to enable sufficient message passing between vehicles. Using this tool, vehicle state and destination, shared map updates, updated algorithm parameters, target information, and decision reconciliation can be effectively shared between vehicles using the published Compact Control Language (CCL) standard for acoustic messages.
to:
One of the greatest challenges of working in the underwater regime is the severe limitations of acoustic communications. This problem becomes even more evident in multi-vehicle autonomy, when vehicles must continually update each other with their state and intentions to achieve cooperative goals. In order to support tests of a multi-vehicle arbiter framework, an optimization scheme was created and implemented as a MOOS module to enable sufficient message passing between vehicles. Using this tool, vehicle state and destination, shared map updates, updated algorithm parameters, target information, and decision reconciliation can be effectively shared between vehicles using the published Compact Control Language (CCL) standard for acoustic messages.

''Topics:'' Acoustic Communications, Multi-Vehicle Autonomy, Autonomy
Changed line 7 from:
%color=#449944% '''Andrew Bouchard, NSWC PCD'''
to:
%color=#449944% '''Andrew Bouchard, NSWC-PCD'''
Changed line 7 from:
%color=#449944% '''Andrew Bouchard, NSWC PCD'''%
to:
%color=#449944% '''Andrew Bouchard, NSWC PCD'''
Changed line 7 from:
%color=#449944% !!! '''Andrew Bouchard, NSWC PCD'''%
to:
%color=#449944% '''Andrew Bouchard, NSWC PCD'''%
Changed line 7 from:
!!! '''Andrew Bouchard, NSWC PCD'''
to:
%color=#449944% !!! '''Andrew Bouchard, NSWC PCD'''%
Changed line 7 from:
'''Andrew Bouchard, NSWC PCD'''
to:
!!! '''Andrew Bouchard, NSWC PCD'''
Changed line 5 from:
!! Title: ''Unmanned Robot Message Optimization Method (URMOM)''
to:
!! ''Unmanned Robot Message Optimization Method (URMOM)''
Changed line 5 from:
Title: ''Unmanned Robot Message Optimization Method (URMOM)''
to:
!! Title: ''Unmanned Robot Message Optimization Method (URMOM)''
Changed lines 1-3 from:
Title: Unmanned Robot Message Optimization Method (URMOM)

Andrew Bouchard, NSWC PCD
to:
(:notitle:)
(:notitlegroup:)
(:nofooter:)

Title: ''Unmanned Robot Message Optimization Method (URMOM)''

'''Andrew Bouchard, NSWC PCD'''
Changed lines 5-6 from:
     One of the greatest challenges of working in the underwater regime is the
severe limitations of acoustic communications. This problem becomes even more evident in multi-vehicle autonomy, when vehicles must continually update each other with their state and intentions to achieve cooperative goals. In order to support tests of a multi-vehicle arbiter framework, an optimization scheme was created and implemented as a MOOS module to enable sufficient message passing between vehicles. Using this tool, vehicle state and destination, shared map updates, updated algorithm parameters, target information, and decision reconciliation can be effectively shared between vehicles using the published Compact Control Language (CCL) standard for acoustic messages.
to:
One of the greatest challenges of working in the underwater regime is the severe limitations of acoustic communications. This problem becomes even more evident in multi-vehicle autonomy, when vehicles must continually update each other with their state and intentions to achieve cooperative goals. In order to support tests of a multi-vehicle arbiter framework, an optimization scheme was created and implemented as a MOOS module to enable sufficient message passing between vehicles. Using this tool, vehicle state and destination, shared map updates, updated algorithm parameters, target information, and decision reconciliation can be effectively shared between vehicles using the published Compact Control Language (CCL) standard for acoustic messages.
Changed lines 5-14 from:
     One of the greatest challenges of working in the underwater regime is the \
severe limitations of acoustic communications. This problem becomes even more e\
vident
in multi-vehicle autonomy, when vehicles must continually update each ot\
her
with their state and intentions to achieve cooperative goals. In order to s\
upport
tests of a multi-vehicle arbiter framework, an optimization scheme was c\
reated
and implemented as a MOOS module to enable sufficient message passing be\
tween
vehicles. Using this tool, vehicle state and destination, shared map upda\
tes
, updated algorithm parameters, target information, and decision reconciliat\
ion
can be effectively shared between vehicles using the published Compact Cont\
rol
Language (CCL) standard for acoustic messages.
to:
     One of the greatest challenges of working in the underwater regime is the
severe limitations of acoustic communications. This problem becomes even more evident in multi-vehicle autonomy, when vehicles must continually update each other with their state and intentions to achieve cooperative goals. In order to support tests of a multi-vehicle arbiter framework, an optimization scheme was created and implemented as a MOOS module to enable sufficient message passing between vehicles. Using this tool, vehicle state and destination, shared map updates, updated algorithm parameters, target information, and decision reconciliation can be effectively shared between vehicles using the published Compact Control Language (CCL) standard for acoustic messages.
Added lines 1-14:
Title: Unmanned Robot Message Optimization Method (URMOM)

Andrew Bouchard, NSWC PCD

    One of the greatest challenges of working in the underwater regime is the \
severe limitations of acoustic communications. This problem becomes even more e\
vident in multi-vehicle autonomy, when vehicles must continually update each ot\
her with their state and intentions to achieve cooperative goals. In order to s\
upport tests of a multi-vehicle arbiter framework, an optimization scheme was c\
reated and implemented as a MOOS module to enable sufficient message passing be\
tween vehicles. Using this tool, vehicle state and destination, shared map upda\
tes, updated algorithm parameters, target information, and decision reconciliat\
ion can be effectively shared between vehicles using the published Compact Cont\
rol Language (CCL) standard for acoustic messages.