Talk

10-Djapic

Talk.10-Djapic History

Hide minor edits - Show changes to output

Added line 19:
* Autonomy / Collaborative Autonomy
Changed lines 20-21 from:
* USVs/ASCs
* UUVs
/AUVs
to:
* Unmanned Surface Vehicles (USVs) / Autonomous Surface Craft (ASCs)
* Unmanned Underwater Vehicles (UUVs) / Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs)
Changed line 20 from:
* USVs
to:
* USVs/ASCs
Changed line 23 from:
* Mission Control
to:
* Mission Control / Mission Visualization
Changed lines 15-16 from:
The mine disposal programme of work at NURC is developing and testing a new system based on an USV and a simple underwater kamikaze vehicle with a sonar-aided navigation system. To reduce the cost associated with the underwater kamikaze vehicle (UV), all the expensive sensors used for navigation (e.g., DVL, inertial sensors, etc.) have been removed. The UV position is estimated automatically by the forward looking sonar onboard the USV. The range and bearing data, together with the x and y-axis position of the sonar head, are communicated acoustically from the USV to the UV. Using this information, and the z-axis position coming from onboard inexpensive pressure sensor, the UV can calculate its 3D position. In order to realize this experiment, one of the two USVs which were procured and moosified last year has been heavily modified to include the integration of multiple payloads: a forward looking sonar, an acoustic modem, an underwater pan and tilt unit, a variable depth system for the sonar, and a release mechanism for the autonomous underwater vehicle. All these devices have been integrated using MOOS for inter-process communications and new behaviors have been implemented in the back-seat driver to develop new strategies to support the disposal mission. Different approaches for sensor data communication has been discussed and considered. The new behaviors allow the possibility to keep an object in the field-of-view of the sonar by combining pan & tilt unit and USV control strategies, and give the ability to USV to circle around or keep the distance from an object detected in the sonar image. Compared to last year implementation we have abandoned the ARM MOOS architecture due to the real-time image generation and processing requirements, and all the processes are now running on an embedded PC (core2Duo) which is connected via Ethernet to the front-seat controller and to the shore station. The new GUIs have been programmed to allow operator control of the mission and to allow real-time sonar data visualization. In addition, a new process has been implemented on the front-seat to manage the hand-over of control between the MOOS Ivp-helm, the factory OIS (Operator Interface from SeaRobotics), and a new remote control for recovery/deployment and emergency operations. In summary, the presentation provides an example of a complex system and a solution for the integration of multiple devices.
to:
The mine disposal programme of work at NURC is developing and testing a new system based on an USV and a simple underwater kamikaze vehicle with a sonar-aided navigation system. To reduce the cost associated with the underwater kamikaze vehicle (UV), all the expensive sensors used for navigation (e.g., DVL, inertial sensors, etc.) have been removed. The UV position is estimated automatically by the forward looking sonar onboard the USV. The range and bearing data, together with the x and y-axis position of the sonar head, are communicated acoustically from the USV to the UV. Using this information, and the z-axis position coming from onboard inexpensive pressure sensor, the UV can calculate its 3D position. In order to realize this experiment, one of the two USVs which were procured and moosified last year has been heavily modified to include the integration of multiple payloads: a forward looking sonar, an acoustic modem, an underwater pan and tilt unit, a variable depth system for the sonar, and a release mechanism for the autonomous underwater vehicle. All these devices have been integrated using MOOS for inter-process communications and new behaviors have been implemented in the back-seat driver to develop new strategies to support the disposal mission. Different approaches for sensor data communication has been discussed and considered. The new behaviors allow the possibility to keep an object in the field-of-view of the sonar by combining pan & tilt unit and USV control strategies, and give the ability to USV to circle around or keep the distance from an object detected in the sonar image. Compared to last year's implementation we have abandoned the ARM MOOS architecture due to the real-time image generation and processing requirements, and all the processes are now running on an embedded PC (core2Duo) which is connected via Ethernet to the front-seat controller and to the shore station. The new GUIs have been programmed to allow operator control of the mission and to allow real-time sonar data visualization. In addition, a new process has been implemented on the front-seat to manage the hand-over of control between the MOOS IvP-Helm, the factory OIS (Operator Interface from SeaRobotics), and a new remote control for recovery/deployment and emergency operations. In summary, the presentation provides an example of a complex system and a solution for the integration of multiple devices.
Added lines 19-21:
* Mine Countermeasures
* USVs
* UUVs/AUVs
Changed line 23 from:
* Anti-Submarine Warfare
to:
* Mission Control
Changed line 13 from:
!!!!%color=#449944% '''V. Djapic, S. Fioravanti, A. Grati, M. Paoli, NATO Undersea Research Centre'''
to:
!!!!%color=#449944% '''V. Djapic, S. Fioravanti, A. Grati, M. Paoli, NATO Undersea Research Centre (NURC)'''
Changed line 11 from:
!! Talk-10: ''Integration of multiple sensors and robotic systems onboard an USV via MOOS''
to:
!! Talk-10: ''Integration of Multiple Sensors and Robotic Systems Onboard a USV via MOOS''
Changed line 5 from:
!!!! %color=#7777BB% [[Talk.09-Djapic | Prev-Talk]]%%  | \
to:
!!!! %color=#7777BB% [[Talk.09-Grati | Prev-Talk]]%%  | \
Changed line 15 from:
The mine disposal programme of work at NURC is developing and testing a new system based on an USV and a simple underwater kamikaze vehicle with a sonar-aided navigation system. To reduce the cost associated with the underwater kamikaze vehicle (UV), all the expensive sensors used for navigation (e.g., DVL, inertial sensors, etc.) have been removed. The UV position is estimated automatically by the forward looking sonar onboard the USV. The range and bearing data, together with the x and y-axis position of the sonar head, are communicated acoustically from the USV to the UV. Using this information, and the z-axis position coming from onboard inexpensive pressure sensor, the UV can calculate its 3D position. In order to realize this experiment, one of the two USVs which were procured and moosified last year has been heavily modified to include the integration of multiple payloads: a forward looking sonar, an acoustic modem, an underwater pan & tilt unit, a variable depth system for the sonar, and a release mechanism for the autonomous underwater vehicle. All these devices have been integrated using MOOS for inter-process communications and new behaviors have been implemented in the back-seat driver to develop new strategies to support the disposal mission. Different approaches for sensor data communication has been discussed and considered. The new behaviors allow the possibility to keep an object in the field-of-view of the sonar by combining pan & tilt unit and USV control strategies, and give the ability to USV to circle around or keep the distance from an object detected in the sonar image. Compared to last year implementation we have abandoned the ARM MOOS architecture due to the real-time image generation and processing requirements, and all the processes are now running on an embedded PC (core2Duo) which is connected via Ethernet to the front-seat controller and to the shore station. The new GUIs have been programmed to allow operator control of the mission and to allow real-time sonar data visualization. In addition, a new process has been implemented on the front-seat to manage the hand-over of control between the MOOS Ivp-helm, the factory OIS (Operator Interface from SeaRobotics), and a new remote control for recovery/deployment and emergency operations. In summary, the presentation provides an example of a complex system and a solution for the integration of multiple devices.
to:
The mine disposal programme of work at NURC is developing and testing a new system based on an USV and a simple underwater kamikaze vehicle with a sonar-aided navigation system. To reduce the cost associated with the underwater kamikaze vehicle (UV), all the expensive sensors used for navigation (e.g., DVL, inertial sensors, etc.) have been removed. The UV position is estimated automatically by the forward looking sonar onboard the USV. The range and bearing data, together with the x and y-axis position of the sonar head, are communicated acoustically from the USV to the UV. Using this information, and the z-axis position coming from onboard inexpensive pressure sensor, the UV can calculate its 3D position. In order to realize this experiment, one of the two USVs which were procured and moosified last year has been heavily modified to include the integration of multiple payloads: a forward looking sonar, an acoustic modem, an underwater pan and tilt unit, a variable depth system for the sonar, and a release mechanism for the autonomous underwater vehicle. All these devices have been integrated using MOOS for inter-process communications and new behaviors have been implemented in the back-seat driver to develop new strategies to support the disposal mission. Different approaches for sensor data communication has been discussed and considered. The new behaviors allow the possibility to keep an object in the field-of-view of the sonar by combining pan & tilt unit and USV control strategies, and give the ability to USV to circle around or keep the distance from an object detected in the sonar image. Compared to last year implementation we have abandoned the ARM MOOS architecture due to the real-time image generation and processing requirements, and all the processes are now running on an embedded PC (core2Duo) which is connected via Ethernet to the front-seat controller and to the shore station. The new GUIs have been programmed to allow operator control of the mission and to allow real-time sonar data visualization. In addition, a new process has been implemented on the front-seat to manage the hand-over of control between the MOOS Ivp-helm, the factory OIS (Operator Interface from SeaRobotics), and a new remote control for recovery/deployment and emergency operations. In summary, the presentation provides an example of a complex system and a solution for the integration of multiple devices.
Changed lines 5-18 from:
!!!! %color=#7777BB% [[Talk.01-Lepage|Prev-Talk]]%%  | \
%color=#7777BB%[[Talk.02-YaariA|Next-Talk]]%% | \
%color=#7777BB%[[Talk.Listing|All-Talks]] | \
%color=#7777BB%[[Talk.ListingSorted|Talks-Sorted]]%% 


!! Talk-01: ''Behaviour Development for Anti-Submarine Warfare: The Design of a MOOS-IvP Behavior Based on Maximizing the Doppler of Autonomous Assets Operating Within a Bistatic Sonar System''

!!!!%color=#449944%
'''Kevin LePage, NATO Undersea Research Centre'''

The NATO Undersea Research Centre is currently exploring
system concepts for collaborative ASW using AUVs.  As part of this effort the design of autonomy algorithms (behaviours) which are adaptive on Doppler-sensitive sonar signals is being pursued.  MOOS-IvP is currently used onboard two Ocean Explorer AUVs which each have horizontal line arrays and accompanying CW signal processing software capable of converting acoustic signals into time-bearing-Doppler contacts.  These contacts are fused with FM contacts within NURC's DMHT tracker.  The fused CW-FM tracks are acted on by the behaviours implemented within the MOOS-IvP software architecture.  In this talk we explore the performance of a behaviour which seeks to maximize the future Doppler on contacts of interest. The collaborative use of this behaviour with a second vehicle performing traditional FM processing is also considered.


to:
!!!! %color=#7777BB% [[Talk.09-Djapic | Prev-Talk]]%%  | \
%color=#7777BB%[[Talk.11-Murphy | Next-Talk]]%% | \
%color=#7777BB%[[Talk.Listing | All-Talks]] | \
%color=#7777BB%[[Talk.ListingSorted | Talks-Sorted]]%% 


!! Talk-10: ''Integration of multiple sensors and robotic systems onboard an USV via MOOS''

!!!!%color=#449944% '''V. Djapic, S. Fioravanti, A. Grati, M. Paoli, NATO Undersea Research Centre
'''

The mine disposal programme of work at NURC is developing and testing a new
system based on an USV and a simple underwater kamikaze vehicle with a sonar-aided navigation system. To reduce the cost associated with the underwater kamikaze vehicle (UV), all the expensive sensors used for navigation (e.g., DVL, inertial sensors, etc.) have been removed. The UV position is estimated automatically by the forward looking sonar onboard the USV. The range and bearing data, together with the x and y-axis position of the sonar head, are communicated acoustically from the USV to the UV. Using this information, and the z-axis position coming from onboard inexpensive pressure sensor, the UV can calculate its 3D position. In order to realize this experiment, one of the two USVs which were procured and moosified last year has been heavily modified to include the integration of multiple payloads: a forward looking sonar, an acoustic modem, an underwater pan & tilt unit, a variable depth system for the sonar, and a release mechanism for the autonomous underwater vehicle. All these devices have been integrated using MOOS for inter-process communications and new behaviors have been implemented in the back-seat driver to develop new strategies to support the disposal mission. Different approaches for sensor data communication has been discussed and considered. The new behaviors allow the possibility to keep an object in the field-of-view of the sonar by combining pan & tilt unit and USV control strategies, and give the ability to USV to circle around or keep the distance from an object detected in the sonar image. Compared to last year implementation we have abandoned the ARM MOOS architecture due to the real-time image generation and processing requirements, and all the processes are now running on an embedded PC (core2Duo) which is connected via Ethernet to the front-seat controller and to the shore station. The new GUIs have been programmed to allow operator control of the mission and to allow real-time sonar data visualization. In addition, a new process has been implemented on the front-seat to manage the hand-over of control between the MOOS Ivp-helm, the factory OIS (Operator Interface from SeaRobotics), and a new remote control for recovery/deployment and emergency operations. In summary, the presentation provides an example of a complex system and a solution for the integration of multiple devices.
Changed line 5 from:
!!!! %color=#7777BB% [[Talk.01-Newman|Prev-Talk]]%%  | \
to:
!!!! %color=#7777BB% [[Talk.01-Lepage|Prev-Talk]]%%  | \
Changed lines 11-21 from:
!! Talk-01: ''MOOS Then, Now and Next''

!!!!%color=#449944% '''Paul Newman, Oxford'''

I will provide a perspective about where MOOS came from, why I designed it as I did, where I think its
strengths lie and where I think there
is room for improvement. I will describe of the range of
platforms and projects MOOS has been, is and will be used on. I won't restrict attention to the marine domain - indeed some of the most challenging deployments have been on land in particular large scale infrastructure free navigation. As I conclude I'll look ahead to the planned next substantial release of MOOS  and describe the new functionality therein
.



to:
!! Talk-01: ''Behaviour Development for Anti-Submarine Warfare: The Design of a MOOS-IvP Behavior Based on Maximizing the Doppler of Autonomous Assets Operating Within a Bistatic Sonar System''

!!!!%color=#449944% '''Kevin LePage, NATO Undersea Research Centre'''

The NATO Undersea Research Centre
is currently exploring system concepts for collaborative ASW using AUVs.  As part of this effort the design of autonomy algorithms (behaviours) which are adaptive on Doppler-sensitive sonar signals is being pursued.  MOOS-IvP is currently used onboard two Ocean Explorer AUVs which each have horizontal line arrays and accompanying CW signal processing software capable of converting acoustic signals into time-bearing-Doppler contacts.  These contacts are fused with FM contacts within NURC's DMHT tracker.  The fused CW-FM tracks are acted on by the behaviours implemented within the MOOS-IvP software architecture.  In this talk we explore the performance of a behaviour which seeks to maximize the future Doppler on contacts of interest. The collaborative use of this behaviour with a second vehicle performing traditional FM processing is also considered.



Changed lines 22-24 from:
* MOOS Core
* Academia

%%
to:
* MOOS-IvP
* Anti-Submarine Warfare

%%
Changed lines 11-12 from:
!! Talk-01: ''MOOS Updates (PLACEHOLDER)''
to:
!! Talk-01: ''MOOS Then, Now and Next''
Changed lines 15-18 from:
No Abstract Yet.


to:
I will provide a perspective about where MOOS came from, why I designed it as I did, where I think its
strengths lie and where I think there is room for improvement
. I will describe of the range of
platforms and projects MOOS has been, is and will be used on. I won't restrict attention to the marine domain - indeed some of the most challenging deployments have been on land in particular large scale infrastructure free navigation. As I conclude I'll look ahead to the planned next substantial release of MOOS  and describe the new functionality therein.




Added line 24:
* MOOS Core
Changed line 8 from:
%color=#7777BB%[[Talk.ListingSorted|All-Sorted]]%% 
to:
%color=#7777BB%[[Talk.ListingSorted|Talks-Sorted]]%% 
Changed line 7 from:
%color=#7777BB%[[Talk.Listing|All-Talks]] |
to:
%color=#7777BB%[[Talk.Listing|All-Talks]] | \
Changed lines 7-8 from:
%color=#7777BB%[[Talk.Listing|All-Talks]]%% 
to:
%color=#7777BB%[[Talk.Listing|All-Talks]] |
%color=#7777BB%[[Talk.ListingSorted|All-Sorted
]]%% 
Changed lines 5-6 from:
!!!! %color=#7777BB% [[Talk.03-Redfield|Prev-Talk]]%%  | \
%color=#7777BB%[[Talk.05-BillinGumstix|Next-Talk]]%% | \
to:
!!!! %color=#7777BB% [[Talk.01-Newman|Prev-Talk]]%%  | \
%color=#7777BB%[[Talk.02-YaariA|Next-Talk]]%% | \
Changed lines 10-17 from:
!! Talk-29: ''Integration and Testing of a Novel Reacquire/Identify Pattern Generation Algorithm''

!!!!%color=#449944% '''Matthew J. Bays, Jean-François Kamath and Signe A. Redfield, NSWC-PCD'''

We address the integration and field testing of a novel reacquire/identify(RID) pattern generation algorithm.  This algorithm, known as Probabilistic Reacquire/ID Optimal Path Selection (PROPS), is designed to plan a path for a sidescan sonar equipped underwater vehicle in order to produce multiple views of a cluster of discrete targets.  The desired pattern minimizes the total number of turns and time required, while attaining appropriate coverage of the targets. Initial tests of the pattern generation algorithm suggest that it requires between 35% and 95% of the time required by the standard “star” RID pattern.  Following a brief description of the algorithm itself, we present the integration of the algorithm, both as a stand-alone MOOS module and as a library using a standard RID pattern generator created from the MOOS-IvP Helm autonomy toolkit.  Simulation and field test results of the algorithm on a REMUS 100 autonomous underwater vehicle are included
.


to:
!! Talk-01: ''MOOS Updates (PLACEHOLDER)''

!!!!%color=#449944% '''Paul Newman, Oxford'''

No Abstract Yet
.


Changed lines 20-24 from:
* Autonomy
* MOOS-IvP
* MCM
* UUVs
* Navy Labs
to:
* Academia
Changed line 18 from:
!!!!%color=#BD614A% '''Categories:''' \
to:
!!!!%color=#4444BB% '''Categories:''' \
Changed line 10 from:
!! Talk-04: ''Integration and Testing of a Novel Reacquire/Identify Pattern Generation Algorithm''
to:
!! Talk-29: ''Integration and Testing of a Novel Reacquire/Identify Pattern Generation Algorithm''
Changed line 18 from:
!!!%color=#BD614A% '''Categories:''' \
to:
!!!!%color=#BD614A% '''Categories:''' \
Changed line 18 from:
%color=#BD614A% '''Categories:''' \
to:
!!!%color=#BD614A% '''Categories:''' \
Changed lines 6-7 from:
%color=#7777BB%[[Talk.05-BillinGumstix|Next-Talk]]%% 
to:
%color=#7777BB%[[Talk.05-BillinGumstix|Next-Talk]]%% | \
%color=#7777BB%[[Talk.Listing|All-Talks
]]%% 
Changed line 11 from:
!!!!%color=#449944% '''Matthew J. Bays, Jean- François Kamath and Signe A. Redfield, NSWC-PCD'''
to:
!!!!%color=#449944% '''Matthew J. Bays, Jean-François Kamath and Signe A. Redfield, NSWC-PCD'''
Changed line 5 from:
!!!! %color=#7777BB% [[Talk.03-Redfield|Prev-Talk]]%%  |
to:
!!!! %color=#7777BB% [[Talk.03-Redfield|Prev-Talk]]%%  | \
Changed lines 5-6 from:
!!!! %color=#7777BB% [[Talk.03-Redfield|Prev-Talk]]%%  | [[Talk.05-BillinGumstix|Next-Talk]] 
to:
!!!! %color=#7777BB% [[Talk.03-Redfield|Prev-Talk]]%%  |
%color=#7777BB%[[Talk.05-BillinGumstix|Next-Talk]]%% 
Changed line 5 from:
!!!! %color=#444499% [[Talk.03-Redfield|Prev-Talk]]%%  | [[Talk.05-BillinGumstix|Next-Talk]] 
to:
!!!! %color=#7777BB% [[Talk.03-Redfield|Prev-Talk]]%%  | [[Talk.05-BillinGumstix|Next-Talk]] 
Changed line 5 from:
!!!! %color=#449944% [[Talk.03-Redfield|Prev-Talk]]%%  | [[Talk.05-BillinGumstix|Next-Talk]] 
to:
!!!! %color=#444499% [[Talk.03-Redfield|Prev-Talk]]%%  | [[Talk.05-BillinGumstix|Next-Talk]] 
Changed line 5 from:
[[Talk.03-Redfield|Prev-Talk]]  | [[Talk.05-BillinGumstix|Next-Talk]] 
to:
!!!! %color=#449944% [[Talk.03-Redfield|Prev-Talk]]%%  | [[Talk.05-BillinGumstix|Next-Talk]] 
Changed line 5 from:
[[Talk.04-Redfield|Prev-Talk]]  | [[Talk.04-Redfield|Next-Talk]] 
to:
[[Talk.03-Redfield|Prev-Talk]]  | [[Talk.05-BillinGumstix|Next-Talk]] 
Added lines 4-6:

[[Talk.04-Redfield|Prev-Talk]]  | [[Talk.04-Redfield|Next-Talk]] 

Changed line 7 from:
%color=#449944% '''Matthew J. Bays, Jean- François Kamath and Signe A. Redfield, NSWC-PCD'''
to:
!!!!%color=#449944% '''Matthew J. Bays, Jean- François Kamath and Signe A. Redfield, NSWC-PCD'''
Changed line 5 from:
!! ''Integration and Testing of a Novel Reacquire/Identify Pattern Generation Algorithm''
to:
!! Talk-04: ''Integration and Testing of a Novel Reacquire/Identify Pattern Generation Algorithm''
Changed line 13 from:
%color=#BD614A% '''Topics:''' \
to:
%color=#BD614A% '''Categories:''' \
Added line 19:
* Navy Labs
Changed lines 5-11 from:
!! ''MOOS-Enabled Semi-Autonomous Remote USV Operations''

%color=#449944% '''Signe Redfield, NSWC-PCD'''

A multi-vehicle mission involving simultaneous identification (by UUVs) and neutralization (by a USV)
of targets is complicated by the need to keep the neutralization efforts distant from the
identification vehicles.  As targets are identified by the UUVs, they are relayed to the USV for imaging (proxy for neutralization).  The USV plans
a sequence of neutralization efforts based on desired efficiency (prosecuting targets in close proximity in the same sequence), neutralization capacity (number of targets that can be prosecuted without reloading), the location of the reloading depot, and distance from other vehicles.  We present a solution to this variation of the capacitated vehicle routing problem, implemented on a semi-autonomous USV.  MOOS performed the autonomous portion of the mission running on a remote laptop while a human operator ran a teleoperated underwater vehicle launched and retrieved from the USV as a proxy for the neutralization system as each target was reached. Together the system demonstrated semi-autonomous remote USV operations, with the human operator working smoothly with the autonomous system.
to:
!! ''Integration and Testing of a Novel Reacquire/Identify Pattern Generation Algorithm''

%color=#449944% '''Matthew J. Bays, Jean- François Kamath and Signe A. Redfield, NSWC-PCD'''

We address the integration and field testing
of a novel reacquire/identify(RID) pattern generation algorithm.  This algorithm, known as Probabilistic Reacquire/ID Optimal Path Selection (PROPS), is designed to plan a path for a sidescan sonar equipped underwater vehicle in order to produce multiple views of a cluster of discrete targets.  The desired pattern minimizes the total number of turns and time required, while attaining appropriate coverage of the targets. Initial tests of the pattern generation algorithm suggest that it requires between 35% and 95% of the time required by the standard “star” RID pattern.  Following a brief description of the algorithm itself, we present the integration of the algorithm, both as a stand-alone MOOS module and as a library using a standard RID pattern generator created from the MOOS-IvP Helm autonomy toolkit.  Simulation and field test results of the algorithm on a REMUS 100 autonomous underwater vehicle are included.


Deleted line 14:
* Multi-Vehicle Autonomy
Changed line 17 from:
* Neutralization
to:
* MCM
Deleted line 18:
* USVs
Changed lines 5-10 from:
!! ''Autonomous Adaptive Environmental Feature Tracking on Board AUVs: Tracking the Thermocline''

%color=#449944% '''Stephanie Petillo, MIT (LAMSS)'''

This talk addresses the challenge of autonomously and adaptively tracking features of the underwater environment using AUVs running the MOOS-IvP autonomy software.  This problem is addressed from concept to implementation in the field on various AUV platforms, developing specifically the example of thermocline trackingSome recent research involving methods for feature tracking on board multiple AUVs operating simultaneously and collaboratively to detect an underwater feature will also be discussed briefly.
to:
!! ''MOOS-Enabled Semi-Autonomous Remote USV Operations''

%color=#449944% '''Signe Redfield, NSWC-PCD'''

A multi-vehicle mission involving simultaneous identification (by UUVs) and neutralization (by a USV) of targets is complicated by the need to keep the neutralization efforts distant from the
identification vehicles.  As targets are identified by
the UUVs, they are relayed to the USV for imaging (proxy for neutralization)The USV plans a sequence of neutralization efforts based on desired efficiency (prosecuting targets in close proximity in the same sequence), neutralization capacity (number of targets that can be prosecuted without reloading), the location of the reloading depot, and distance from other vehicles.  We present a solution to this variation of the capacitated vehicle routing problem, implemented on a semi-autonomous USV.  MOOS performed the autonomous portion of the mission running on a remote laptop while a human operator ran a teleoperated underwater vehicle launched and retrieved from the USV as a proxy for the neutralization system as each target was reached. Together the system demonstrated semi-autonomous remote USV operations, with the human operator working smoothly with the autonomous system.
Deleted line 13:
* Environmental Sampling
Added line 17:
* Neutralization
Added line 19:
* USVs
Added line 17:
* UUVs
Changed lines 9-10 from:
One of the greatest challenges of working in the underwater regime is the severe limitations of acoustic communications. This problem becomes even more evident in multi-vehicle autonomy, when vehicles must continually update each other with their state and intentions to achieve cooperative goals. In order to support tests of a multi-vehicle arbiter framework, an optimization scheme was created and implemented as a MOOS module to enable sufficient message passing between vehicles. Using this tool, vehicle state and destination, shared map updates, updated algorithm parameters, target information, and decision reconciliation can be effectively shared between vehicles using the published Compact Control Language (CCL) standard for acoustic messages.
to:
This talk addresses the challenge of autonomously and adaptively tracking features of the underwater environment using AUVs running the MOOS-IvP autonomy software.  This problem is addressed from concept to implementation in the field on various AUV platforms, developing specifically the example of thermocline tracking.  Some recent research involving methods for feature tracking on board multiple AUVs operating simultaneously and collaboratively to detect an underwater feature will also be discussed briefly.
Changed line 13 from:
* Acoustic Communications,
to:
* Environmental Sampling
Changed lines 15-17 from:
* Autonomy%%
to:
* Autonomy
* MOOS-IvP
%%
Changed line 7 from:
%color=#449944% '''Stephanie Petillo, MIT (LAMSS)''
to:
%color=#449944% '''Stephanie Petillo, MIT (LAMSS)'''
Changed lines 5-7 from:
!! ''Unmanned Robot Message Optimization Method (URMOM)''

%color=#449944% '''Andrew Bouchard, NSWC-PCD'''
to:
!! ''Autonomous Adaptive Environmental Feature Tracking on Board AUVs: Tracking the Thermocline''

%color=#449944% '''Stephanie Petillo, MIT (LAMSS)''
Changed lines 11-15 from:
%color=#BD614A% '''Topics:''' Acoustic Communications, Multi-Vehicle Autonomy, Autonomy%%
to:
%color=#BD614A% '''Topics:''' \

*
Acoustic Communications,
*
Multi-Vehicle Autonomy
* Autonomy%%
Changed line 11 from:
''Topics:'' Acoustic Communications, Multi-Vehicle Autonomy, Autonomy
to:
%color=#BD614A% '''Topics:''' Acoustic Communications, Multi-Vehicle Autonomy, Autonomy%%
Changed lines 9-11 from:
One of the greatest challenges of working in the underwater regime is the severe limitations of acoustic communications. This problem becomes even more evident in multi-vehicle autonomy, when vehicles must continually update each other with their state and intentions to achieve cooperative goals. In order to support tests of a multi-vehicle arbiter framework, an optimization scheme was created and implemented as a MOOS module to enable sufficient message passing between vehicles. Using this tool, vehicle state and destination, shared map updates, updated algorithm parameters, target information, and decision reconciliation can be effectively shared between vehicles using the published Compact Control Language (CCL) standard for acoustic messages.
to:
One of the greatest challenges of working in the underwater regime is the severe limitations of acoustic communications. This problem becomes even more evident in multi-vehicle autonomy, when vehicles must continually update each other with their state and intentions to achieve cooperative goals. In order to support tests of a multi-vehicle arbiter framework, an optimization scheme was created and implemented as a MOOS module to enable sufficient message passing between vehicles. Using this tool, vehicle state and destination, shared map updates, updated algorithm parameters, target information, and decision reconciliation can be effectively shared between vehicles using the published Compact Control Language (CCL) standard for acoustic messages.

''Topics:'' Acoustic Communications, Multi-Vehicle Autonomy, Autonomy
Changed line 7 from:
%color=#449944% '''Andrew Bouchard, NSWC PCD'''
to:
%color=#449944% '''Andrew Bouchard, NSWC-PCD'''
Changed line 7 from:
%color=#449944% '''Andrew Bouchard, NSWC PCD'''%
to:
%color=#449944% '''Andrew Bouchard, NSWC PCD'''
Changed line 7 from:
%color=#449944% !!! '''Andrew Bouchard, NSWC PCD'''%
to:
%color=#449944% '''Andrew Bouchard, NSWC PCD'''%
Changed line 7 from:
!!! '''Andrew Bouchard, NSWC PCD'''
to:
%color=#449944% !!! '''Andrew Bouchard, NSWC PCD'''%
Changed line 7 from:
'''Andrew Bouchard, NSWC PCD'''
to:
!!! '''Andrew Bouchard, NSWC PCD'''
Changed line 5 from:
!! Title: ''Unmanned Robot Message Optimization Method (URMOM)''
to:
!! ''Unmanned Robot Message Optimization Method (URMOM)''
Changed line 5 from:
Title: ''Unmanned Robot Message Optimization Method (URMOM)''
to:
!! Title: ''Unmanned Robot Message Optimization Method (URMOM)''
Changed lines 1-3 from:
Title: Unmanned Robot Message Optimization Method (URMOM)

Andrew Bouchard, NSWC PCD
to:
(:notitle:)
(:notitlegroup:)
(:nofooter:)

Title: ''Unmanned Robot Message Optimization Method (URMOM)''

'''Andrew Bouchard, NSWC PCD'''
Changed lines 5-6 from:
     One of the greatest challenges of working in the underwater regime is the
severe limitations of acoustic communications. This problem becomes even more evident in multi-vehicle autonomy, when vehicles must continually update each other with their state and intentions to achieve cooperative goals. In order to support tests of a multi-vehicle arbiter framework, an optimization scheme was created and implemented as a MOOS module to enable sufficient message passing between vehicles. Using this tool, vehicle state and destination, shared map updates, updated algorithm parameters, target information, and decision reconciliation can be effectively shared between vehicles using the published Compact Control Language (CCL) standard for acoustic messages.
to:
One of the greatest challenges of working in the underwater regime is the severe limitations of acoustic communications. This problem becomes even more evident in multi-vehicle autonomy, when vehicles must continually update each other with their state and intentions to achieve cooperative goals. In order to support tests of a multi-vehicle arbiter framework, an optimization scheme was created and implemented as a MOOS module to enable sufficient message passing between vehicles. Using this tool, vehicle state and destination, shared map updates, updated algorithm parameters, target information, and decision reconciliation can be effectively shared between vehicles using the published Compact Control Language (CCL) standard for acoustic messages.
Changed lines 5-14 from:
     One of the greatest challenges of working in the underwater regime is the \
severe limitations of acoustic communications. This problem becomes even more e\
vident
in multi-vehicle autonomy, when vehicles must continually update each ot\
her
with their state and intentions to achieve cooperative goals. In order to s\
upport
tests of a multi-vehicle arbiter framework, an optimization scheme was c\
reated
and implemented as a MOOS module to enable sufficient message passing be\
tween
vehicles. Using this tool, vehicle state and destination, shared map upda\
tes
, updated algorithm parameters, target information, and decision reconciliat\
ion
can be effectively shared between vehicles using the published Compact Cont\
rol
Language (CCL) standard for acoustic messages.
to:
     One of the greatest challenges of working in the underwater regime is the
severe limitations of acoustic communications. This problem becomes even more evident in multi-vehicle autonomy, when vehicles must continually update each other with their state and intentions to achieve cooperative goals. In order to support tests of a multi-vehicle arbiter framework, an optimization scheme was created and implemented as a MOOS module to enable sufficient message passing between vehicles. Using this tool, vehicle state and destination, shared map updates, updated algorithm parameters, target information, and decision reconciliation can be effectively shared between vehicles using the published Compact Control Language (CCL) standard for acoustic messages.
Added lines 1-14:
Title: Unmanned Robot Message Optimization Method (URMOM)

Andrew Bouchard, NSWC PCD

    One of the greatest challenges of working in the underwater regime is the \
severe limitations of acoustic communications. This problem becomes even more e\
vident in multi-vehicle autonomy, when vehicles must continually update each ot\
her with their state and intentions to achieve cooperative goals. In order to s\
upport tests of a multi-vehicle arbiter framework, an optimization scheme was c\
reated and implemented as a MOOS module to enable sufficient message passing be\
tween vehicles. Using this tool, vehicle state and destination, shared map upda\
tes, updated algorithm parameters, target information, and decision reconciliat\
ion can be effectively shared between vehicles using the published Compact Cont\
rol Language (CCL) standard for acoustic messages.