Experiment #1  Holding DIM=2 IPFS=10 DOMAIN_SIZE 1000
               Unif/Grid size=50, thus 400 piece - held constant
               Vary Pieces 1000 to 10000

Experiment #2  Holding DIM=4 IPFS=10 DOMAIN_SIZE=1000
               Unif/Grid size=250, thus 256 pieces - held constant
               Vary Pieces 1000 to 10000

//============================================================
// Experiments 3-5 differ only in the percentage of pieces used
//             in making the initial uniform grid. In Exp#3 very
//             few are used and grid bound values are not terribly
//             predictive. Thus V3 outperforms V4 for higher IPFs
//============================================================

Experiment #3  Holding DIM=2 PCS=3500 DOMAIN_SIZE=1000
               Unif/Grid size 100 - so 100 uniform pieces 
               Vary IPFS 5, 10, ... 75
	       *Note: too few uniform, ineffective grid bound
	       *For higher IPFS, V3 outperforms V4

Experiment #4  Holding DIM=2 Pieces=3500 DOMAIN_SIZE=1000x1000
               Unif/Grid size 50 - so 400 uniform pieces
               Vary IPS 5, 10, ... 75

Experiment #5  Holding DIM=2 Pieces=3500 DOMAIN_SIZE=1000x1000
               Unif/Grid size 20 - so 2500 uniform pieces
               Vary IPS 5, 10, ... 75
    
//============================================================
// Experiments 6-7 testing the effect of solution threshold
//============================================================

Experiment #6  Holding DIM=2 IPFS=75 Pieces=7500 DOMAIN_SIZE=1000x1000
               Unif/Grid size 40 - so 625 unif pieces, 6875 smart
	       Vary Thresh 90, 91, ..., 90, 90.2, ... 90.8, 100 

Experiment #6  Holding DIM=4 IPFS=75 Pieces=7500 DOMAIN_SIZE=1000x1000
               Unif/Grid size 200 - so 5x5x5x5=625 unif pieces, 6875 smart
	       Vary Thresh 90, 91, ..., 90, 90.2, ... 90.8, 100